Interview for the show:

[Attempt at Exhausting a Place / Tentative d’épuisement d’un lieu]  title is inspired by the poetry book by Georges Perec. How do you relate it to your art practice and to this specific body of work?

Since the beginning of my art practice most of what I do is connected to the observation of the world or my surroundings and the capacity of understanding or dealing with it. I am interested in the indeterminacy and illegibility adhering to all types of images, or better said, in the indistinctness of our perceptions. The resulting ambivalences and contradictions that are characteristic of gestures have therefore become an important theme to me. George Perec gave himself exactly that task in observing and writing down what happened when he was at Place Saint-Sulpice. He is not only describing the space or is creating a poetic form of how time is passing with what actions or things there. He is also provoking his limit of sense. How much can you see and write down, how much are you missing?

Talk about the importance of drawing in your artistic practice and let us know how you started.

As I mentioned from the beginning of my art practice drawing and observing was an important practice for me. For example, at the beginning of my studies I was drawing people in the tram. That would limit my time to draw them because they would mostly leave after 2- 15 min. That changes your decision making and how you draw a line with the pencil. At the same time I was interested in the capsule everybody created for themselves while sitting in the tram with their phone, book or music. In the end I had a portrait of a fragile crowd in their seats which produced a lot of empathy and relating to each other. This developed further into reconstructions of different actions or situations which I started drawing mostly on long sheets of (japanese) paper. I for instance reconstructed a dance to draw it from one perspective in space to see if I would understand that movement more. The opposite was the case. It created a network of motions which the viewer is composing while watching that drawing. 

You have used the delicate Japanese Washi paper as support of these works. What is the importance of the material and why did you use it to this series of artworks?

I became interested in Washi paper in the last years of my study. Even though it often looks very fragile it is a very strong paper. I use it to layer several sheets on which I simultaneously draw on the front and backside (mostly for the big movement reconstructions). In 2016 I then went to Japan with a Goethe Institut Residency in Kyoto and researched that kind of paper, how it is made. The Fusuma Doors in the Japanese Temples for example have up to seven layers of (different) paper. So I learned their techniques to layer paper which had a strong influence on how I install the paper nowadays. 

Regarding your research for Rhythmanalysis art pieces, you mixed media and techniques that together form what we can consider a sculptural artwork. Please talk about the importance of technology to your artistic trajectory. 

While in the drawings the context is hidden in favor of the appearance of movement, in my videos the context and in particular the communication through human actions is dealt with. The attention shifts towards the emergence of social meanings and narratives through the movements and gesture´s embedding during their performance. With my work “Rhythmanalysis” I then began to use movement of pedestrians or exhibition visitors as compositional influence in creating my works. Compositions and editing of theses video installations are thereby controlled or changed by the movement of distant pedestrians or exhibition visitors (sometimes unnoticed). In that work I use a very contemporary automation technique (computer generated animation and data processing) in combination with the traditional manual technique of drawing. I like this combination because both techniques talk about the same. I combined them to create depth to the image and also give them an equal relevance which they have in my process of creating artworks.

In your opinion can we also consider the “Rhythmanalysis” book by Henri Lefebvre a political statement? What are the influences we can notice on your body of work when talking about Henri Lefebvre ideas?